The projections for every industrialized country, including the US, is bleak: Birthrates are already terrible, or in the case of the US the younger generations can’t really fathom the financial, emotional and health risks of having children.
The peasants are being phased out due to AI and robotics. Elites of course continue their old system of dynasty building and interlocking. It is simply an expense for them to control the political-ideological sphere in order to prevent any real, functioning resistance.
In short: Having kids was made too expensive, too miserable and politics just make it worse.
The radical redpill right more or less wants to roll back the enlightenment and have some sort of medieval system where a father buys a young wife for his son or similar arrangements. Some incel cults tell men to just play videogames and rot. The radical woke left wants to eradicate most of masculinity itself. It is a legal scam to feign love, get married/pregnant, and then just leave with the money. Nobody trusts anybody on any level.
Those outside of the radical realm figure out that the math just aint mathing. Two incomes from more professional work are needed as a baseline and even when you are careful with mortgages and car payments and none of the children are autistic or whatever, you don’t have much time to spend with your kids or as partners. The kids are “raised” by the public school system, other dysfunctional kids and social media. By the time they’re about 11 they realize mom and dad are just very uncool roommates who hate their lives. Working mothers turn into alcoholics who lose any attractiveness by age 35 at the latest and often their sex drive too. Married men are expected to be just work peasants without anything positive in their lives.If they complain they are labeled toxic. Staying single means you can pay for everything in full yourself and have not a single loyal soul in your life. Everybody is just engaged in transactions with you. Whereas elites have a vast network of loyalty, you are alone and vulnerable. Being the cool boss girl in the corporate wolrd is getting old and stale after about 10 years.
Until there is barely anybody left
American Professor Paul R. Ehrlich (Royal Society) had warned that the worst kind of food shortages would occur in 1975 due to overpopulation and that, therefore, people in the USA would have to be forcibly sterilized using substances added to drinking water and basic foodstuffs. The much-vaunted “population bomb” was a dud. In 1969, he stated in the New York Times:
“By the time enough evidence is gathered to convince people, they will already be dead.”
He also claimed that we would all be enveloped in blue clouds due to air pollution within 20 years. Men like Ehrlich, Prince Philip, Jacques Cousteau, and Eric Pianka vehemently warned that population growth was progressing so dangerously fast that drastic measures must be taken to prevent the planet from dying or humanity from soon having to fight for the last remaining resources in overcrowded conditions. But is population growth really that dire? Have the various methods employed by the aristocracy and oligarchs already taken effect and slowed the rate of increase?
In 2018, authors Darrell Bricker and John Ibbitson published their study, “Empty Planet: The Shock of Global Population Decline,”1 in which they conclude that population figures will only continue to rise for a relatively short time before they collapse. The United Nations estimates that population growth will plateau at 11 billion by the year 2100. Alternatively, the population peak could reach only 9 billion between 2040 and 2060, after which the decline would begin, eventually reaching the level we currently occupy at the beginning of the 21st century. Or, the current population levels could remain constant until 2100 and then continue to fall. The richest countries are experiencing the steepest declines: Germany and Japan are aging rapidly, and Italy is a “dying country,” as the Minister of Health attested in 2015. China is on the verge of collapse, as are Brazil and Indonesia. India will stabilize in the foreseeable future and then shrink. Even in Africa, the dampening effect is evident. The nobility and scientists desire epidemics to accelerate population reduction and simultaneously possess the capacity to unleash them. In 541, the Plague of Justinian devastated the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire and the entire Mediterranean region. Some estimates place the death toll at up to 50 million, or 40% of the population. Around the year 1300, the world population had reached 400 million when the so-called “Black Plague” raged, supposedly another outbreak of Yersinia pestis. However, the extremely high rate of spread and death toll point more towards a pathogen like Ebola, which did not rely on rat and flea populations for transmission. Estimates range from 30 to 60% deaths in the affected region, or up to 200 million people. In what is now Mexico, there were devastating epidemics in 1545 and 1576. Between 1775 and 1782, North America experienced a massive smallpox epidemic, right in the middle of the American Revolutionary War. George Washington had his soldiers vaccinated. In 1918, the Spanish flu swept across the globe, killing around 50 million people. In India alone, more than 17 million people are believed to have died from the Spanish flu. Reliable estimates are difficult to obtain for many other countries. By 1700, the world population had reached 600 million; by 1800, it had surpassed one billion, pushing civilization to its limits. Drinking water, sewage systems, medicine, and machinery were rudimentary and had to keep pace with a population increasingly working in factories, living in slum-like conditions, and suffering from food insecurity. Then cholera spread from the Ganges Delta to Europe. Scientists identified its bacterial transmission route and began using chlorine and filtration systems for drinking water and sewage. Improved education for women lowered birth rates in developed countries, and the “Swedish model” of the ubiquitous welfare state further amplified this effect. After World War II, the US passed the GI Bill, a law supporting returning soldiers, which made the modern American middle class possible, complete with attractive suburban homes, nice cars, and space for an average of 3.7 children. Sometimes, a comfortable standard of living required nothing more than a better job in an auto factory. In West Germany there was the economic miracle and a
Significant growth was also observed in developing countries. Urbanization eventually caused birth rates to plummet; by 2007, the world’s population was more urban than rural. The decriminalization of abortion and the introduction of the birth control pill freed women from traditional constraints and offered the possibility of shorter-term, childless relationships and careers. The economic miracle in the US and Germany did not last very long and transitioned into a period characterized by considerably less optimism. Having more than two children became a significant economic risk. China and India were transformed into new industrial centers through Western support, but at the same time, the Club of Rome published its report “The Limits to Growth,” and green propaganda in television, newspapers, and magazines was significantly intensified. It would only take a few moderate epidemics, economic problems, and a couple of wars to lower the global birth rate by 0.5, causing the world population to peak at 8.5 billion in 2050 and then decline ever more rapidly. Even in urban slums and megacities, women today have internet access, greater access to education, and less desire for children. In industrialized countries, 80% of the population already lives in urban areas. A downward trend is emerging in Africa, and even in the Philippines, the birth rate is falling by half a baby every five years. Italy saw a new record low in births in 2015. 200 schools are closing in Poland, and Portugal’s population could halve by 2060. Researchers have noted that the increasing weakness and decline in the influence of churches correlate directly with falling birth rates. Even Muslims in Europe will likely have a birth rate of only 2.0 by 2030, 0.1 below the level necessary for a stable population. Bulgaria consistently refuses to accept migrants and refugees, yet its population has shrunk from nine to seven million in 30 years. Another third will disappear by 2050. In Russia, the situation is so disastrous that it is already accepting large numbers of Muslims. And as in other countries, population implosion is exponential: if the current generation already has too few women of childbearing age, and these women have too few children, then these children will later have too few children of their own. Japan is aging rapidly, and its rival industrialized nation, South Korea, is also aging. Employees are increasingly exploited and less inclined to have children. Childless women earn as much as men, meaning that children are responsible for the gender pay gap. A good college education for children can cost five or six figures, and more attractive properties cost six to seven figures. And what if the romance fades and someone files for divorce? In 2016, 14 of the 30 fastest-growing economies were on the African continent, and ever-increasing funds are being channeled there for the “Marshall Plan for Africa.” Europe is being bled dry, Africa is being modernized, and is paying the price with declining fertility rates. Even in Kenya, poor people now have smartphones, and young women are learning that they have options and don’t have to stay in their villages to bear ten children.
Muslim Demographics
For the past few years, the spread of Islam has been a top issue for many people; some fear a widespread “population replacement,” while others, as if with a crystal ball, prophesy a balanced multicultural society. The leadership of the EU and NATO has no intention of making Europe predominantly Muslim, because access to modern European technology and education would offer Islam too many opportunities to establish a genuine new caliphate. While the global Muslim population is growing twice as fast as any other over the next two decades and could reach 26.4% by 2030, Muslims are almost entirely concentrated in impoverished countries controlled by regimes that are themselves dependent on Britain and America. Even the Saudis hoard three-quarters of their money in Western banks. As soon as regimes in North Africa reached the third generation of ruling families and attempted to take the next step of establishing a sham democracy and a sham capitalism controlled by intelligence services, they were overthrown. Consistent, stabilizing military interventions by EU states there would have been far cheaper than the costs of the migration of refugees and economic migrants. Various planned targets exist for Muslim demographics in Europe, and all options seem designed simply to sow tension within society, because the usual ideological division into left, right, and center is no longer applicable.
It is not effective enough to keep people employed. The Pew Research Center has analyzed mountains of data and calculated various scenarios.2 Currently, there are an estimated 25.8 million Muslims in Europe; a share of 4.9%.
- The figures with a total migration stoppage: A total migration stoppage in Europe could only occur if war breaks out with Russia or if the risk of war increases significantly. With zero migration, the Muslim population in Europe will rise to 7.4% by 2050.
- With “normal” migration flows: With ordinary migration flows, the share of Muslims will rise to 11.2% by 2050.
- With new refugee flows: If refugee flows were to continue as they did at their peak between 2014 and 2016, the share would rise to 14%.
Depending on how EU member states increase the proportion of non-Muslim migration and how the native non-Muslim population is financially supported, the percentage of Muslims can be controlled quite precisely in the coming decades. Bureaucrats, with the help of political scientists, security experts, and other academics, will decide exactly where this percentage ends up, between 7.4% and 14%. It’s worth looking at the USA: there, African Americans make up around 12.7% of the population, and Latinos/Hispanics 17%. If you include ethnically white Latinos and Hispanics among the white population, the figure rises to 76.9% white. The USA is therefore far from losing its predominantly white character, but the population groups remain artificially alienated from one another and are also politically divided between left and right. Such figures create a society that is easy to manage and doesn’t immediately descend into chaos. In some EU countries, such as Germany, an extreme influx of migrants could result in Muslims comprising 20% of the population by 2050. In more moderate scenarios, the figure would be between 9% and 12%. Sweden, in an extreme case, could have 31% Muslims by 2050, but this would be politically unsustainable, and moreover, it would risk a conflict with Russia, which would halt migration. Sweden could also be brought down to a standard figure of 13%. Muslims are divided among themselves into various denominations, and their birth rate is declining with each generation. Economic crises and a weakening of the welfare state could further dampen this trend. Interestingly, the Muslim population in Russia, at an estimated 10%, is significantly higher than in Europe. In former Soviet republics, there are even Muslim majorities. In an extreme scenario, the proportion of Muslims in Russia could rise to 30% within the next 15 years. If we apply the brakes here, we would have values that correspond to those targeted by the EU. David P. Goldman shows in his book “How Civilizations Die (And Why Islam is Dying Too)” that Muslims are also facing a problem with birth rates.3 Iranian women who grew up with five to seven siblings will themselves only have one or two children. The situation is similar in Turkey and Algeria. Other Muslim nations show the same trend. After a final surge, things are going downhill. By 2050, the belt of Muslim countries from Morocco to Iran will be as gray as Europe, and that with only one-tenth of the productivity.
Iranian women who grew up with five to seven siblings will themselves only have one or two children.
The Class of the Useless
The Israeli military historian, “futurist,” and bestselling author Yuval Noah Harari presented his book “Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow” and predicted that in the age of robots, the new societal “class of the useless” will soon become the biggest problem:
“Billions of people who are not only unemployed, but cannot be employed at all. […] In the future, perhaps all power will lie with a few billionaires who own the algorithms that control all vehicles.”
For months, the mass media have been preaching the transformation of the welfare state principle into a universal basic income in order to keep the masses happy in the future. The mass media are also suddenly discovering sympathy for Waldorf schools and kindergartens, where all pressure to perform is eliminated and children only play, dance, and do crafts. After all, once these children grow up, they won’t need to work anyway.
“According to a study by the renowned Oxford University, 47 percent of jobs will have disappeared in just 25 years.”
Until now, the school system has only served the purpose of producing joyless, workaholic drones. In the future, the goal is to produce relaxed hipsters who spend their entire lives at the level of a teenager. Not all of them will be constantly playing video games, but rather pursuing pseudo-intellectual activities “that are fun.” Once again, the media and politicians are implementing exactly what was discussed at the Bilderberg conferences. In recent years, Bilderberg has focused on the so-called “precariat,” the social class of those without jobs or job prospects.
The number of those left behind by modernization is rising dramatically, not least because of the influential circles associated with Bilderberg. Kissinger, Rockefeller, and other figures made it possible decades ago for Western industrial jobs to migrate to China. Bilderberg’s pet project, the EU and the Euro, also destroyed jobs and prosperity. Currently, 17% of working-age EU citizens are long-term unemployed, and in the US, up to 100 million people are either unemployed or lack stable employment. This precariat is perceived as a threat, and the mainstream media, which is close to Bilderberg, recommends a universal basic income as a “solution.” The Swiss recently rejected such a proposal, but the welfare state is slated for restructuring. This approach pacifies the population and ensures that benefit recipients will aggressively defend the new order, while the middle class continues to shrink. The age of robotics is here, and while much industrial production will return to the West, it will be in the form of robot factories. The more jobs disappear, the more powerful the state becomes as provider and boss.
Sources:
[1] Empty Planet: The Shock of Global Population Decline, Darrell Bricker and John Ibbitson, Robinson
[2] Europe’s Growing Muslim Population, November 29, 2017, https://www.pewforum.org/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/
[3] How Civilizations Die (And Why Islam is Dying Too), David Goldman (Author), Regnery Publishing
